Posts: 101
Name: Hanmore Jemimah the Fourth
Location: the front line
|
Of course whatever side you stand (and we can see what side that is) of the debate on the ethics of selling filth and porn, ultimately celebrity porn is an infringement of no doubt several legal protections celebrities enjoy. Would your business model be incompatible with legitimately and legally promoting the merchandise of the celebrities you are using to brand yourself.
I suppose it probably, in your mind anyway, IS fair to just hijack part of the millions of dollars the celebrity's owning company spent on making that brand. Assuming they agree with you, you'll never be targeted by legal or policing institutions for that which is your work, your contribution to the world.
Hmm. I did some "hard work" and looked at your celeb site and enjoyed what is essentially fairly tame soft porn. So tell me all about the copyrights of the pictures you are publishing and using as the focus for users to power your site and any income you are seeking for people here to help you figure out how to bring into existence?
Could you not just make "honest" porn instead? I'm sure people don't worry too much if the woman is famous when they are "using" your site.
But as the owner (and copyright holder) of GQ magazine and Maxim you no doubt already know all these facts well.
Last edited by CannonFodder; 01-04-2011 at 09:03 AM..
|