Its the very first time i have done this - this is someone who has decided to take onboard another company - please pick the bones out of this:
http://www.thevalleygroup.com/webref.../index_001.htm
eh?"!!!!

i'm no expert but.......ahem

Eeeyeewwww... hello 1995 - all TABLES.. and a loosey-goosey HTML 4.0 transitional doctype .. yuck. Hardly a 'professional' 21st job at all.

that looks like something that was generated by a shonky html generator .
Im particularly fond of the 37 or so strung together instances of:
td><img src="images/spacer.gif" width="12" height="1" border="0" alt=""></td>
And apparnetly thats supposed to be search engine freindly . Hmmmm - dont think so there is 194 or so lines of code before the spiders actually get to any content - that cant be good can it?

I dont know how my <td><img src="images/spacer.gif" width="12" height="1" border="0" alt=""></td> managed to get substituted with webmaster-talk????????
Thats the proper one anyway.

im really confused now - it seems when i post this images - spacer string - somehow "Webmaster-talk" appears in it

eh???? and now its gone - i think im seeing things - I need a beer.

actually - back to the point - i this line "<!--Fireworks CS3 Dreamweaver CS3 target. Created Tue Dec 23 16:32:00 GMT+0000 (GMT) 2008-->" seems to give the game away that it is a fireworks export - if that is the case then adobe need a good slap - i hate to say it but that code looks as badly generated as something that MS Word would do.
Surley you would have thought if this is the case - then something like fireworks cs3 would have done a better job.
My dog Milo could write cleaner code than that.

That is why it is NOT a good idea to export from Fireworks or Photoshop. However. BOTH programs CAN export using CSS rather than tables - and it's not pretty code either. It's a matter of honing the settings in Fireworks. It may SEEM like exporting from FW or PS is a time-saving idea - but overall it's a very BAD idea.