Tycoon Talk
Become a Big fish!
The number 1 forum for online business!
Post topics, ask questions, share your knowledge.
Tycoon Talk is part of Freelancer.com - find skilled workers online at a fraction of the cost.

HTML Forum


You are currently viewing our HTML Forum as a guest. Please register to participate.
Login



Post a Project »

Find a Professional HTML Freelancer!

Find a Freelancer to help you with your HTML projects

FREE Outsourcing eBook!

Reply
A question about the ditched style tags in HTML5
Old 06-19-2010, 11:31 PM A question about the ditched style tags in HTML5
Extreme Talker

Posts: 168
Name: James
Location: Australia
Trades: 0
Where is my question about?
It is in relation to the list of HTML tags of which have now been ditched as from HTML5.

These tags being the old HTML style tags of font, tt, b, etc.

How I take it is, in recent HTML 4, they have been given the status of 'outdated' in a very harsh term. but now, they are going one strong step more than that, they are going to be dropped all together and therefore any strict browser will simply not support them.


What I ask about them is...

What exactly will happen to browsers who choose to go HTML5 strict?

Are there plans to re-allocate these tags with new meanings, like b could become like to mean a second section of the page like 'section id=b' perhaps. Or, will they be for-ever held in reserve for backward compatability issues?

Would it be just that, text between two B tags will just be 'not boldised' by deafult?

If I had a website with B tags, because I want them to boldise a line of text, and lets say I want to keep them, would I be able to fix them by doing this following bit of CSS
.... B {font-weight:bold}

Would that be enough to ensure that my browsers will continu to do text between b tags in bold?
TRANZIT JIM is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit TRANZIT JIM's homepage!
 
 
Register now for full access!
Old 06-19-2010, 11:41 PM Re: A question about the ditched style tags in HTML5
JeremyMiller's Avatar
WT Moderator

Posts: 1,712
Name: Jeremy Miller
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Trades: 0
This is not something you'll need to worry about when supporting major browser for quite a number of years. My understanding is that in the event that a browser does not support a tag, you can through the javascript command of createElement define the tag and then apply a style to it.
__________________
Jeremy Miller

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
JeremyMiller is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit JeremyMiller's homepage!
 
Old 06-20-2010, 07:31 AM Re: A question about the ditched style tags in HTML5
chrishirst's Avatar
Missing! presumed drunk.

Posts: 42,380
Name: Chris Hirst
Location: Blackpool. UK
Trades: 0
Quote:
they are going to be dropped all together and therefore any strict browser will simply not support them.
IF the document is using a HTML5 DTD

The DTD defines the rules a document should be parsed and rendered with. The browser/user agent should apply the rules and properties as stated in the DTD NOT some arbitrary rules made by the browser developer.

If <b> does not exist in the DTD applied to the document then it should be ignored for that document ONLY.
__________________
Chris. ->>
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
<<-

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- Is SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
chrishirst is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit chrishirst's homepage!
 
Reply     « Reply to A question about the ditched style tags in HTML5
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML



Page generated in 1.09623 seconds with 12 queries