Tycoon Talk
Become a Big fish!
The number 1 forum for online business!
Post topics, ask questions, share your knowledge.
Tycoon Talk is part of Freelancer.com - find skilled workers online at a fraction of the cost.

HTML Forum


You are currently viewing our HTML Forum as a guest. Please register to participate.
Login



Post a Project »

Find a Professional HTML Freelancer!

Find a Freelancer to help you with your HTML projects

FREE Outsourcing eBook!

Closed Thread
HTML 4.01 strict vs HTML 5 vs XHTML
Old 03-08-2011, 03:52 AM HTML 4.01 strict vs HTML 5 vs XHTML
Banned

Posts: 2
Trades: 0
[Basically the title says it all, until now I've been doing all my coding in XHTML strict....

With html5 being the future however I am rethinking things a little. Should I convert the html over to html 4.01 or html 5. I am honestly loathe to go to html5 yet due to it being new and probably not hugely supported browser marketshare wise.

But I am wondering whether converting the code to html 4.01 might make it easier to up to html 5 when the time comes.
removed What's everyones thoughts on this?

Last edited by chrishirst; 03-08-2011 at 04:17 AM..
cioan is offline
View Public Profile
 
 
Register now for full access!
Old 03-11-2011, 02:47 PM Re: HTML 4.01 strict vs HTML 5 vs XHTML
LadynRed's Avatar
Defies a Status

Posts: 10,017
Location: Tennessee
Trades: 0
There's really no 'conversion' to do at this point. There's also no reason to delay using HTML5, as long as you're not trying to use the new HTML5-specific tags.
__________________
Web Goddess & Web Standards Evangelist :) - Tables Be Gone !!

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE

LadynRed is offline
View Public Profile
 
Old 03-11-2011, 04:12 PM Re: HTML 4.01 strict vs HTML 5 vs XHTML
vangogh's Avatar
Post Impressionist

Latest Blog Post:
Why Responsive Design?
Posts: 10,815
Name: Steven Bradley
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Trades: 0
html5 is backwards compatible so your html 4.01 or xhtml 1.1 or whatever should still work. Also as long as you keep the old docytpe that's how browsers will interpret the code. There's really no need to change anything.

On the other hand there's no reason not to start using html5 now as LNR mentioned. You won't be able to use all the specific parts of html5, but a lot has already been adopted by most browsers. There are also some relatively simple workarounds.

I can't claim to have done a lot myself with html5, but I have started using the html5 doctype in all projects and have begun slowly working in some of the new things we can do.
__________________
l Search Engine Friendly Web Design |
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE

l Tips On Marketing, SEO, Design, and Development |
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE

l
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
|
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
vangogh is offline
View Public Profile Visit vangogh's homepage!
 
Old 03-17-2011, 07:22 AM Re: HTML 4.01 strict vs HTML 5 vs XHTML
Experienced Talker

Posts: 35
Name: Julie Watson
Trades: 0
HTML 5 can cope up with the old version also because it is made to accommodate the old code also.
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
julie9999 is offline
View Public Profile Visit julie9999's homepage!
 
Closed Thread     « Reply to HTML 4.01 strict vs HTML 5 vs XHTML
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML



Page generated in 0.27584 seconds with 12 queries