Now come on, I've been at this game far too long to take notice of every meta tag that is seen to be used. simply because you can make your own up if you so wish. Even <meta name="position" content="first"> has been seen before. (It doesn't work BTW before any one rushes off to edit their pages).
<meta name="title"... > isn't used by any browser and certainly isn't going to be used by any search engine. so for all intents and purposes there is only one <title> tag that means anything. But of course if you can show that it is used I am always willing to learn something, and to that end I've just put a page up on my site to test it.
If you want more on metas read this.
Quite honestly there is no such thing as a "safe" point or danger point where meta KWs are concerned. If there were, why are all these pages still ranking with over stuffed meta tags, alt attributes etc. IF SEs penalise this kind of spam why do they still exist?
This paranoia about don't repeat words more than 3 times, don't have more than x keywords, don't have outbound links etc etc, is just BS by these so-called experts who half the time don't know their a$$ from their elbow.
There is only one way to get banned or heavily penalised. and that is to be blatently doing something to fool or "game" the SEs and any one who gets their site penalised know what they did.
You do not get banned by designing a site that is good for both visitors and SEs alike.
Also you can have thousands of keywords/phrases for your site if your market place is broad enough. Search Engines rank pages not sites so if you have enough content why do you say 8 keywords maximum for a site? it's a bit limiting if you are selling hundreds of products don't you think ?
__________________
Chris. ->> Links are advertising NOT optimising!! <<-
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- I SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
|