My understanding is that they're only breaking the law if they are aware of illegal content and fail to act. This discourages companies from snooping around their own servers and so most don't. They'll only act if something is reported to them, since then there is proof they were made aware of it.
I don't think he was asking that. I think he was asking about linking TO illegal content hosted on those sites. I could be wrong but from the way he phrased his question that's what it sounds like to me.
As an example, www.allsp.com has all the South Park episodes. It has a disclaimer *claiming* it is legal because they do not host the episodes themselves, they are just linked from other websites.
But in a case like that it is not user-uploaded content -- they are deliberately linking to user-uploaded content on *another* site. In that case I believe it is quite illegal... and I believe a site like www.allsp.com will be shut down once it gets popular enough that it gets noticed... and possibly sued as well.
I made a myspace site ripper (to download songs from myspace) and they threatened to sue, big style. I'm not actually hosting any of the files, but they argued that the only reason the site is there is to infringe on copyright.
Usually with these sites it's not worth the revenue for the risk. Unless you've got a server in sweden or something :P
I want to make a "adult video" site but links to stuff I personally have not uploaded, and linked onto Rapidshare - from random people in the world who have uploaded it
I want to make a "adult video" site but links to stuff I personally have not uploaded, and linked onto Rapidshare - from random people in the world who have uploaded it
I can't post the link to the site: but search wikipedia for
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an "interactive computer service" who publish information provided by others
I'm sure most provider use this as a means of escaping suites.
well its the same reason that isps are protected when their clients download illegal content. They do not moderate watch or control the usage of the users hence they are protected only if they remove the infringing content when a takedown notice is served
That is correct, my friend runs imagehoster.info a while ago and never had a problem even though copyrighted cartoons appeared (when he was notified he deleted them of course)