There should be laws against giving antibiotics to farm animals. We're giving our battle plans to the enemy. Smallpox, by itself, has killed far more people than all the terrorism ( Islamic and otherwise) in human history. It's fashionable to spread fear of terrorism, but here's an area where we have the ability to improve the human condition as well as national and international security.
Bacteria are turning immune to antibiotics. Farming uses antibiotics to prevent infections, promote growth, to channel more of the animal's energy into growing food ( vs, say, bone), and other reasons, as well as to treat actual infections. This is creating a Darwinian selection environment that favors the evolution of any trait making a bacteria resist antibiotics.
Obviously antibiotics are the reason plenty of diseases, like pneumonia, aren't killing off tremendous numbers of humans. It seems like this is every bit as much a threat as some bombing in FarOffistan, and the lucky thing is this would take drastically less attention and resources to fix. Neanderthal man had a life expectancy of 20 to 30 years. Today, thanks to modern medicine, humans are expecting to live to about 80, and gaining a year for most years we live. But we risk turning that trend on its head by making one of our best weapons less and less useful.
What do people think?
Quote:
|
The scientists have so far looked at 40 different samples of bacteria from pigs and discovered resistance genes to tetracyclines, ciprofloxacin, and ampicillin, although so far no resistance has been found to extended-spectrum cephalosporins.
|
http://www.innovations-report.de/htm...cht-33229.html
|