This is gold:
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09...e-39/#comments

Obama claims his management experience running his campaign qualifies him to be president. Rope-a-dope 101.
a) Your not running against Dr. Melfi, so why do you keep comparing yourself to her?
b) She manages a state not a city
c) Your ability to draft a resume does not in and of itself qualify you for the job for which you are applying

Does his logic fly with anyone having an IQ over 80?

Yawn. You must be really concerned for McElderly's replacement's lack of experience to be digging this up. Still stinging from Fixed Noise's comment that she has "foreign policy experience" from being governor of Alaska for a whopping 16 months. "It's right next to Russia, you know."

Ever feel like Sisyphus? Because you sure remind me of him.

Originally Posted by Learning Newbie

You must be really concerned ..... to be digging this up.

Those were my thoughts exactly when I watched him spew this nonsense this morning.

So, speaking of experience, Alaska has the population of what, Gary, Indiana?

Don't have the time to dig it up, but I believe Alaska is #32 in the states for State budget. She commands the National Guard as well as the Alaska State Militia(you have to love a state that maintains a Militia. Land mass size, I believe Alaska is #1. Importance to our economy vis-a-vis oil drilling and energy, Alaska may also rate number 1.

Frankly, she could be the governor of Rhode Island and still carry more executive experience than either McCain or Obama. Not to mention that of the four of them (McCain, Obama, BinLaden, Palin), she is the only one who has ever managed a successful private enterprise, which is definitely a skill and a knowledge base I think any sitting president should have(One of my biggest beefs with McCain).

Too good to pass this up. If Palin were running against Obama, how would their scorecards add up....

http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2...-barack-obama/

A word of advice. Obama and his supporters better stick to comparing themselves to McCain. They dont have a shot against Palin.

Also of interest... none of the mainstream media seem to be talking about the million dollar earmark created for Obama's wifes employers once they gave her a raise. No no.... we need to talk about someone having a baby, much more relevant.

Edit: Oh .... my.... god..... Who vetted this guy. Check this out
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/1...-for-bundlers/
The guy running on change is busily earmarking taxpayer money for his campaign contributors. More of the same? You bet. I return you to your regularly scheduled Sarah Palin bashing.

Come on.... let's not be harsh on Palin... After all, she has it hard enough having to decide every day which oil company she's accepting her next bribe from.

Originally Posted by whym

Come on.... let's not be harsh on Palin... After all, she has it hard enough having to decide every day which oil company she's accepting her next bribe from.

So let me get this straight. You are not only going to acknowledge the evidence showing Obama is routing taxpayer money through special interest groups into his wife's pockets, but you respond with the idea that "who cares about that because Palin is beholden to big oil", when in fact shes made a career out of running against big oil? D*mn bro. Lets hope the democrats have a better response than that.

I watched Bidens response this morning, and from what I saw of it, he was very gracious and repeated that this nonsense about her family has to stop. My respect for the guy went up, as he clearly gets it. They are going to have to back off the experience and family attacks and stick with the concept that Republican ideals have failed us and Democratic ideals will succeed. That path leads to a likely election win. The other....