Tycoon Talk
Become a Big fish!
The number 1 forum for online business!
Post topics, ask questions, share your knowledge.
Tycoon Talk is part of Freelancer.com - find skilled workers online at a fraction of the cost.

SEO Tycoon


You are currently viewing our SEO Tycoon as a guest. Please register to participate.
Login



Freelance Jobs

Reply
Effect of http://name v http://www.name
Old 02-28-2010, 06:34 AM Effect of http://name v http://www.name
Christoph's Avatar
Skilled Talker

Posts: 51
Trades: 0
Dear Webmaster's

I have a quick question:

I have read a lot of stories about gaining links to your nacked domian rather than www. is next to useless.

Aparently its good practise in SEO to try and attain all your backlinks with www.name

I am sligtly confused by this concept, surely its utter rubbish? From a search engine point of view, don't they value "natural" links. With any site gaining "natural" links it would be surely inevitable that this is going to happen and surley wouldnt discredit you as a result.

Looking forward to your responses.
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
[U]
Christoph is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
 
Register now for full access!
Old 02-28-2010, 06:42 AM Re: Effect of http://name v http://www.name
chrishirst's Avatar
Missing! presumed drunk.

Posts: 42,385
Name: Chris Hirst
Location: Blackpool. UK
Trades: 0
Be consistent and use ONE version only and/or redirect the other to your preferred one.

Eventually SEs will figure it out and only show one version BUT any links pointing to the other will be wasted.
__________________
Chris. ->>
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
<<-

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- Is SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
chrishirst is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit chrishirst's homepage!
 
Old 02-28-2010, 06:43 AM Re: Effect of http://name v http://www.name
chrishirst's Avatar
Missing! presumed drunk.

Posts: 42,385
Name: Chris Hirst
Location: Blackpool. UK
Trades: 0
AND

http://www.webmaster-talk.com/websit...tml#post992243
__________________
Chris. ->>
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
<<-

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- Is SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
chrishirst is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit chrishirst's homepage!
 
Old 02-28-2010, 06:49 AM Re: Effect of http://name v http://www.name
Christoph's Avatar
Skilled Talker

Posts: 51
Trades: 0
Thanks Chris,

Really appreciated.

You would think search engines would be able to manage this better by now.
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
[U]
Christoph is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 02-28-2010, 07:17 AM Re: Effect of http://name v http://www.name
chrishirst's Avatar
Missing! presumed drunk.

Posts: 42,385
Name: Chris Hirst
Location: Blackpool. UK
Trades: 0
Actually they never will manage it better than they do now. There are some cases where the www sub-domain and the non-www version may well be different. It is only accepted convention that the two will resolve to the same content provider.
As an example, for technical reasons, we have some sites on our servers where the hostname (non-www) has to resolve to a Linux box and the website itself has to be on a Windows box. Therefore they are on two different IPs.
__________________
Chris. ->>
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
<<-

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- Is SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
chrishirst is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit chrishirst's homepage!
 
Old 03-04-2010, 04:29 AM Re: Effect of http://name v http://www.name
Sierra Charlie's Avatar
Extreme Talker

Posts: 235
Name: Dan Denly
Location: Deerfield Beach
Trades: 0
What I've been doing is point the http://name to www.name through a 301 redirection. Less Hassle, I don't lose my backlinks and I don't have to bite my nails whether the crawler can access it correctly either.

Little point though. If you use a sub domain, SEs think that it's a separate website. Case in point is wordpress and blogspot.

Try using (sub) folders instead of sub domains as much as possible. You automatically send your link juice to the folder. No Problemo. Check this for some insight.
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
|
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
|

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
Sierra Charlie is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit Sierra Charlie's homepage!
 
Old 03-08-2010, 02:46 AM Re: Effect of http://name v http://www.name
janestewart's Avatar
Skilled Talker

Posts: 63
Name: janestewart
Trades: 0
I agree with chris, use any one of the version otherwise redirect the other to your preferred one by using 301.

Thanks Chris.
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
|
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
|

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
janestewart is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Reply     « Reply to Effect of http://name v http://www.name
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML



Page generated in 0.26478 seconds with 12 queries