SEO Tycoon

**daisies1062** · 08-06-2011, 08:13 PM

I don't know if it's true or not and would like to know the veracity of this information of which that it's more valuable (according to some search engines) to use manual html code rather than that of visual one.

**PaulW** · 08-06-2011, 08:16 PM

What does "visual one" mean?

**chrishirst** · 08-07-2011, 06:40 AM

And what is "manual HTML"??

**bigcat1967** · 08-11-2011, 11:42 AM

I'm guessing here - but I think what he means by manual HTML is basically no CMS - just written in a notepad.

Visual would mean a type of CMS?

Just a guess guys...

**chrishirst** · 08-11-2011, 01:57 PM

Not a CMS, more likely a half read, half understood reference to WYSIWYG editors.

**dobraltd** · 08-15-2011, 11:48 AM

Better use any CMS if your website will grow. You will have difficulties adding new content if your website is based on a static HTML pages

**chrishirst** · 08-15-2011, 02:34 PM

Is that right?

I wonder how we managed before somebody created Content Management?????

**Digital Friend** · 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dobraltd

Better use any CMS if your website will grow. You will have difficulties adding new content if your website is based on a static HTML pages

That's why there's PHP. ( if you're referring to editing multiple html pages to gain one result )