|
Some things they don't have thaty you said they could have:
- are better optimised (with probably the exeception of two or three PS3 sites)
- have more links
- have more content
- have better quality links
Which leaves me with aging as a problem, but even so SmashMyPS3 is younger than my site, MaxPS3 I believe is either younger or slightly older, they're affiliated with my other PS3 website but I forgot when I accepted them. It couldn't have been before August so they're most likely younger than PS3.net.
I think the main thing is the current updates from Google. The thing with the shifting has been around, for the keyword PS3 it seems like only website since August has been getting shift around the way it has. Like the other websites are pretty consistent at where they're, which again can be due to them being establish longer than my website.
I'm still confused on why PS3World is still rank high when it hasn't been updated since 7-29-2004. PS3Land just started to update their website in September. Before then the website was updated since July (2 news post) and before that it June (1 news post), and before that it was March (3 news post). Two websites that are rarely kept updated, especially PS3World (been a year), can retain their positions and even move up higher (**** PS3Land.com was #1 for like 2 days last month) after all the shifting Google has done.
__________________
Visit Daily Entertainment Online!
http://www.d-eo.com
|