Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ADAM Web Design
And let's assume you're right. Let's assume the coding and the order of elements makes absolutely no difference. So I'm dead wrong. I'm a complete freakin' idiot for suggesting it. That's the premise.
So: Adam, you're retarded for suggesting a search engine benefit. But does that mean the idea is stupid?
|
Not really, there can be a benefit from the SEM point of view, as there can be a improvement in rendering time in a browser, just not a significant one from the crawl and index POV.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ADAM Web Design
Take a page that you've done with a conventional table-based layout, and one that is done in such a way as to match one of the layouts I've created. Ideally, it should be one with a keyword or phrase that ranks around the 3rd or 4th page of the major SERPs (Google, Yahoo!, MSN).
|
Done this with two sites, taken a table based design and changed the template to an all HTML/CSS.
In both cases nothing changed in the database data and beyond the usual movements nothing remarkable happened in the SERPs either.
__________________
Chris. ->>
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
<<-
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- Is SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
|
