REGISTER
|
Search Tycoon Talk
|
Freelancer.com
|
Members
Tycoon Talk
Become a Big fish!
The number 1 forum for online business!
Post topics, ask questions, share your knowledge.
Tycoon Talk is part of Freelancer.com - find skilled workers online at a fraction of the cost.
Register Here
Forum Rules
SEO Tycoon
You are currently viewing our SEO Tycoon as a guest. Please
register
to participate.
Login
Remember Me?
Login via Freelancer.com
Tycoon Talk
>
SEO & Internet Marketing Tycoon
>
SEO Tycoon
>
Does having a ".co.uk" disadvantage one internationally with Google?
Link Back
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Does having a ".co.uk" disadvantage one internationally with Google?
06-14-2006, 04:35 PM
#
1
(
permalink
)
Does having a ".co.uk" disadvantage one internationally with Google?
Harvey
Super Spam Talker
Posts: 901
Name: Harvey C
Location: Brighton, UK
Trades:
0
Talkupation:
I've got a .co.uk domain and am in 7th place for a search term on Google.co.uk - but on Google
.com
it's in the second page.
Is this trend likely to continue?
__________________
Please login or register to view this content.
Registration is FREE
|
Please login or register to view this content.
Registration is FREE
Register
now for full access!
« Reply to
Does having a ".co.uk" disadvantage one internationally with Google?
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
Tycoon Talk
>
SEO & Internet Marketing Tycoon
>
SEO Tycoon
>
Does having a ".co.uk" disadvantage one internationally with Google?
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Email this Page
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Posting Rules
You
may not
post new threads
You
may not
post replies
You
may not
post attachments
You
may not
edit your posts
BB code
is
On
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
On
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
Off
Pingbacks
are
Off
Refbacks
are
Off
Forum Rules
Feeds:
RSS
JS
XML
Feeds for this forum:
RSS
JS
XML
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Bookmark & Share
Digg this Thread!
Add Thread to del.icio.us
Bookmark in Technorati
Tweet this thread
Page generated in
0.55729
seconds with
12
queries