Quote:
|
The way I understand it is they can't make the changes because it will affect all the other websites on that server..
|
Actually that's BS from another "I can't be bothered" host
Any changes to application mappings (which is what needs to be changed) can be done on a site by site basis so no other site on the server would be affected.
Their next excuses will be;
it's a security risk.
It puts extra load on the server
Both of which are wrong.
Time to move hosts I think.
1/ you can't 301 redirect .shtm(l) or .htm(l) pages from on the page
what you need is for your host (if they can manage to work out how or you can't point them to http://www.candsdesign.co.uk/article...tion-mappings/ ) to have .htm(l) parsed via the .asp interpreter. Then you can use includes and/or asp code on them.
It's very simple, does NOT pose a security risk and does not add any more load on the server than having .asp pages does.
__________________
Chris. ->> Links are advertising NOT optimising!! <<-
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- I SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
|