|
Google+ is better than other sites?
02-15-2012, 07:10 AM
|
Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 1
|
Nowadays, Google+ is more popular among other social networking sites. There are some advance features in it. My question is- Google+ will become more popular than other sites??????????
|
|
|
|
|
02-15-2012, 02:20 PM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 3,081
Name: Michael Caine (look alike). *Sic semper tyrannis*
Location: Chelsea, England. Broke all 10 Commandments.
|
On features, Google+ should replace Facebook. But there is a lot of inertia among Facebook users.
|
|
|
|
|
02-15-2012, 11:49 PM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 30
|
is.........google is going to beat all other social sites/
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 06:00 PM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 42,385
Name: Chris Hirst
Location: Blackpool. UK
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getsourced
is.........google is going to beat all other social sites/
|
Well they do say "Third time lucky"
__________________
Chris. ->>
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
<<-
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- Is SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 06:12 PM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 583
Name: Tony
Location: Seattle Washington
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrishirst
Well they do say "Third time lucky"
|
Friendster, Myspace, Facebook, then Google+? |
|
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 06:45 PM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 42,385
Name: Chris Hirst
Location: Blackpool. UK
|
Nope!
Orkut, Knol, Google+
__________________
Chris. ->>
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
<<-
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- Is SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
|
|
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 09:28 PM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 3,081
Name: Michael Caine (look alike). *Sic semper tyrannis*
Location: Chelsea, England. Broke all 10 Commandments.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrishirst
Nope!
Orkut, Knol, Google+
|
 Google did have some failed attempts, before getting Google+ right.
(If, indeed, it is right! What do you think?) |
|
|
|
|
02-17-2012, 03:05 AM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 788
Name: Joni
Location: In a state of confusion
|
I've been a member about 4-5 months so far no spam or invasions of privacy. I'm not there very often though....
__________________
"Senescence begins and old age ends. When your relatives start to outnumber your friends! the very cool Ogden Nash who also said Candy is dandy but liquor is quicker
Look for my blog coming soon.
|
|
|
|
|
02-17-2012, 03:34 PM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 10,815
Name: Steven Bradley
Location: Boulder, Colorado
|
Chris, don't forget Wave and Buzz. I think Google missed out on the third time's a charm magic.
|
|
|
|
|
02-17-2012, 07:17 PM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 3,081
Name: Michael Caine (look alike). *Sic semper tyrannis*
Location: Chelsea, England. Broke all 10 Commandments.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vangogh
... don't forget Wave and Buzz...
|
 Why not forget them? Most users wanted to! |
|
|
|
|
02-18-2012, 08:14 AM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 42,385
Name: Chris Hirst
Location: Blackpool. UK
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vangogh
Chris, don't forget Wave and Buzz. I think Google missed out on the third time's a charm magic.
|
Aah yes, how could I have forgotten?
I wonder when/if they'll get the idea that they have missed the boat on capturing the world of "social media" 
__________________
Chris. ->>
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
<<-
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- Is SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
|
|
|
|
|
02-18-2012, 08:33 AM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 3,081
Name: Michael Caine (look alike). *Sic semper tyrannis*
Location: Chelsea, England. Broke all 10 Commandments.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrishirst
... I wonder when/if they'll get the idea that they have missed the boat on capturing the world of "social media"...
|
Google will abandon trying to dominate social media when cats stop chasing mice. |
|
|
|
|
02-21-2012, 05:40 AM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 1
|
i think it have develop lot..until now fb is top
|
|
|
|
|
02-21-2012, 04:39 PM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 10,815
Name: Steven Bradley
Location: Boulder, Colorado
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chrishirst
Aah yes, how could I have forgotten?
|
In your defense, neither was what you would call memorable. I think only 3 or 4 people ever saw Wave and Buzz died on arrival. Who could blame you for forgetting them.  |
|
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 05:01 AM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 43
Name: Anton Zaleski
Location: Minsk, Belarus
|
Has anyone ever noticed that a G+ account ranks better of all social networks, no matter how much(little) content and links it has? I've seen that several times, just got interested.
|
|
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 05:06 AM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 103
Name: Sandrah
|
I don't think that Google+ will win and become the best and the first. I am sure that Facebook is not going to be the second and they will everything possible to remain the first.
|
|
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 02:07 PM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 10,815
Name: Steven Bradley
Location: Boulder, Colorado
|
Quote:
|
Has anyone ever noticed that a G+ account ranks better of all social networks
|
If you mean ranking better in Google's results, it's because Google has tweaked things so G+ is more visible. They've been criticized for it already and they have they're excuses for why it's happening. The real reason is that Google is doing everything it can to promote G+ and compete with Facebook. |
|
|
|
|
02-25-2012, 12:41 PM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 3,081
Name: Michael Caine (look alike). *Sic semper tyrannis*
Location: Chelsea, England. Broke all 10 Commandments.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vangogh
... Google is doing everything it can to promote G+ and compete with Facebook.
|
I intend to subject Google to remorseless criticism for doing exactly what I would do in their place. The hounds! The dirty blighters! The rotters! |
|
|
|
|
02-25-2012, 01:35 PM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 788
Name: Joni
Location: In a state of confusion
|
Am I understanding these posts guys? you don't like G+?
Its the first time I've joined a social network. I've been putting of FB for years because they had so many security issues. I understand its better now and eventually I will join but not really in a hurry.
In fact I'm kind of P.O. that I have to. They've pretty much taken control of my "freedom of choice" when it comes to accessing certain sites that I've been a long time member of, as of last year I've experienced less access on one site and another site has closed down because they merged with FB.
Then there's the page ranking thing.. Bastardo's!
__________________
"Senescence begins and old age ends. When your relatives start to outnumber your friends! the very cool Ogden Nash who also said Candy is dandy but liquor is quicker
Look for my blog coming soon.
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2012, 02:55 PM
|
Re: Google+ is better than other sites?
|
Posts: 3,081
Name: Michael Caine (look alike). *Sic semper tyrannis*
Location: Chelsea, England. Broke all 10 Commandments.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystical Pippin
... In fact I'm kind of P.O. that I have to...
|
P.O.? As in per os, meaning "by mouth? (Well, dear, we've seen the jokes that you post!) |
|
|
|
|
« Reply to Google+ is better than other sites?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
