Quote:
|
My new site sells my paintings and prints, (I wanted to distance it for the, how to paint, site as I felt it made me look amateurish)
|
Actually you should be doing the exact opposite.
Information sites, as in your case how to paint, are always easier to build content for, get incoming links to and generally optimise than any commercially selling site is, or will be. It's the nature of the Internet and SEs. Why do you think people write articles or republish articles on their sites?
Integrate the two sites using the established sitename initially while starting a promotion for the new sitename, that is parked and pointed to the same content (there's no such thing as a duplicate content penalty). When the new hostname starts to rank for phrases then set the redirects up.
Use the inherent value of a site that has paid (or partially paid) it's dues WRT the aging delay. DO NOT WASTE IT, an older site with existing links and SE history is now a valuable commodity for Google results.
Not a burr  but it does bug me about people wanting to be changing hostnames for no valid reason. In the grand scheme of things domain names are not important for getting traffic, what is important is that they are memorable and can be branded.
__________________
Chris. ->> Links are advertising NOT optimising!! <<-
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- I SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
|