ram
your home page is in the Google index! The link below is the link to Google's index of your page.
Home Page:
Google Cache
Evidently, my guess would be that even though they are simple, Google is having trouble with your pages due to the fact that you are using one page.
Each of the main pages of the site are only using one variable, however, this variable is attached to the same page.
Examples:- multimontreal.com/
- multimontreal.com/index.php?action=help
- multimontreal.com/index.php?action=links
- ultimontreal.com/index.php?action=register
- multimontreal.com/index.php?action=login
- multimontreal.com/index.php?topic=56.0#top
Most of the time Googlebot doesn't have a problem with pages like this. However, sometimes it does. Not to say that it's not going to index them but it may take more time.
One thing I noticed is in your first post you used the www. version of url for the link to your site. In this last post you used the non-www version. I also noticed that on the site you use non-www in your linking/navigation structure.
Did you realize that
www.mysite.com and mysite.com are considered 2 seperate url's by Google? When you have both versions in googl's cache they each get devalued. (Each only holding a portion of the popularity it has recieved.)
Google's cache of the home page is the www. version. Therefore, you are correct in saying that the site has no pages in Google's cache. (This of course excluding
www.multimontreal.com because it is in the cache.)
Usually things do not go arye until a site is a bit more established. Taking precautions so that it doesn't get out of hand need to be taken. When google starts showing double cache's of your pages (both the www and non-www versions) you need to fix it. You haven't gotten that far yet so it will be easier to fix.
It really doesn't matter which version you use just as long as they are uniform. you always use the same version. However, What I have determined is when people link to your site, they usually use the www version of the url. This of course will pass off this,
Link Juice as we call it to the www version of the page and leaves the non-www version without receiving all opf the benefits that it should from the link. Debate has taken place about this, but IMO I always use the www version because of this reason.
I would say that these are contributin factors. What I would do would be to start to experiment with your url naming. For instance, you are using action as your main querry string variable. Google may be jumping ship when it sees this. I do know that "ID" is a variable that will many times cause googlebot to jump, but, I am not sure about action. I have seen act used successfully, but as I say, I am not sure how action affects googlebot.
Try experimenting by chaning this to something else.
--
Most of your navigaion looks okay. I don't see it causing any problems. Have you added a lot of inbound links over a short period of time?
--
You are going to have to create a checklist of things that normally cause problems and just start going down your list. It is going to be time consuming, but I don't know what else you could do. Something is causing it that is for sure. The site is old enough that google should be adding your pages to its index.
ALthough I do not know the reason, I am sure that ther is a REASON that googlebot isn't following your links.
(1) its just not follosing the links to go deeper into the site.
(2) it is finding the links but not folling them due to an infraction of the site. (i.e. too may added links in a short period of time, or something similar.)
(3) A link bomb from a competitor or something like that.
A lot of nothing I have written, but, I hope you can get some ideas. you are going to need to take action to get this resolved.
One other suggestion: I am a firm believer that sometimes it is easier to start fresh. Time is a wasting. Will a new domain render better results in less time that it will take to fix this? Only a question you can answer. You may love your domain name, but I loved my 67 mustang that was totalled. It ain't worth much anymore...(
just an example. I really never owned a 67 mustang)
~Chip