Ok, all of my sites, were doing well in there search engine rankings, and doing good...(the newer ones) and then they dropped farther then even there own domain name... they don't even show up for number 1 for there domain anme anymore..any post I do about them out ranks them...

I need to know why the hell this would happen. Or what I could do to fix it. I have been putting out links but this doesn't seem to be helping the SE for any of my new sites, while it has been visibly helping my site BGOD SE for it's keywords..I am quite confused...and am seriously in need of help.

2nd question, if Google, is currently trying to read my "feed" page as my main page on my site (the feed page doesn't even get you to the rest of the page...) how can I change this.

I am in big trouble and need someone smart to help. Thanks guys, much <3.

You can use the robot exclusion protocol to keep Google away from your feed.

hm.. I will have to figure out how to use this Robot.txt for my wordpress, I am really worried..o_o I know my sites will gain PR but I wanted my RED network to have there keywords before update -_-... Any more suggestions guys?

Why the hell would anyone around here help you right about now? You shouted from the rooftops about how great you were and how you were the almighty SEO god, and now that you've gotten the asskicking you so richly deserve, you want "the smart people" to bail you out, the ones who already told you how to avoid your silly little mess in the first place?

Get bent.

I heard anchor text works really, really well. The stuff does wonders, they say.

You're in a bit of a pinch, so maybe you don't just need more anchor text, but you need better anchor text, too? What if you put anchor text inside of more anchor text? Maybe something like this?

<a href="http://www.example.com/">
                                                             click here 
   <a href="http://www.super-cool.com/">
                                                             and here, too!!
   </a>
</a>

Now you have two anchor texts. Or one super-anchor text. I like to think of it as one and a half, like if the big guy ate the little one, and now they're fused together. Whatever it is, too bad those aren't your domains in there ... but you might be able to buy them

Don't worry, mods, I don't own super-cool.com, I just am super-duper cool, and they named it after me - I'm not trying to sell the guy anything.

LMAO, this has got to be the most karmic thing I have ever seen.

Vasity, enjoy your freshly dug hole, just try not to defecate in it.

I have decided not to explain why I posted these generic questions.

Thanks for all answers, have a great day.


You people are pathetic, it just shows how smal minded you really are, can't even help someone? HA. Moderator talking ****..beautiful.

I tried to delete this post...o_o.

the ones who already told you how to avoid your silly little mess in the first place?

HMM..


So if I get this right, my content is screwing with my SEO . That makes poetic sence. But you guys have given 0 other information on anything. at all. I just have to see what's up with these weird blogs, as I have never had a similar problem with HTML sites...o_o odd.

But nothing I can't solve, and you guys gave me this challenge. And since you all already have a pre-dispoistion to me. It's not like me being nice is going to change anything, you guys are all bent on telling me to F*CK OFF! that's fine.

Maybe I deserve it...lol... But, I will figure it out. ....

I mean, if I can get compeitive search phrases I should be able to find out whats wrong with my network....something is obv..o_o.

I FIXED MY ISSUE...

Actually one of my blogs showed me my problem..thank god for me..GO ME!

You got to love it

Googles timing is immaculate

Vasity;
Maybe you should go back and read some of your "willy-waving" threads where at least 5 more experienced and knowlegable people told you precisely what would happen.
Then gave up telling you, because obviously you know more that all of them put together.

I have decided not to explain why I posted these generic questions.

You don't need to explain, I'm sure the majority of people reading this will know exactly why you asked.

I mean, if I can get compeitive search phrases I should be able to find out whats wrong with my network....something is obv..o_o.

Nope, all perfectly normal.

I mean, if I can get compeitive search phrases I should be able to find out whats wrong with my network....something is obv..o_o.

How about that you still can't even spell competitive?

Don't worry, mods, I don't own super-cool.com, I just am super-duper cool, and they named it after me - I'm not trying to sell the guy anything.

I'm so jealous, Forrest. I'm super-cool too, and no one registered a dotcom in my honor. I may weep openly.

Search engines, particularly Google, have a funny property, Vasity. They have the ability to strip away massive egos and spam techniques, both of which you've exhibited in spades, and figure out objectively which sites should rank highest and which shouldn't even rank at all.

Hirst was right; we all told you what was going to happen at some point and how silly you were (and still are) being. As Hirst quite rightly pointed out, though, your vision is impaired because you're waving your unit around in front of your face so much showing everyone else how big it is.

* grins at Forrest *

Wanna increase the size of your *****? Up to 4 INCHES in a MONTH, BRO! And FAT, too!

Originally Posted by chrishirst

You got to love it

Googles timing is immaculate

Vasity;
Maybe you should go back and read some of your "willy-waving" threads where at least 5 more experienced and knowlegable people told you precisely what would happen.

ok I will do this...=).

Then gave up telling you, because obviously you know more that all of them put together. (I don't apperently, herein admitted in this thread.)


You don't need to explain, I'm sure the majority of people reading this will know exactly why you asked. (yea -_-)


Nope, all perfectly normal.
Perfectly normal...x_x...

My rankings will dissapear for a while, due to the fact I put to many back links up at once? (although I found some of my rankings up again last night)...I am going to do a nice review of my sites... Thanks Adam, and Chris I will try not to be such a DICK all the time, when you guys are only TRYING TO HELP my thick headed a$$

Originally Posted by Vasity

But nothing I can't solve, and you guys gave me this challenge. And since you all already have a pre-dispoistion to me. It's not like me being nice is going to change anything, you guys are all bent on telling me to F*CK OFF! that's fine.

Would it really hurt to try?

Look, I'm gonna level with you, but first I need to get something off my chest. This post cheered me up a little. Had to give R some green TP for his karma commend, A for the spam jokes, and F for the anchor text bit. Those were funny, and appropriate in context. I actually would have given you positive TP for cheering me a little up this time, but you made that impossible. Ever since I heard that Bush is giving AMNESTY to that criminal traitor, I've been so angry I'm seeing red. It's like the rule of law just doesn't apply any more. And all of a sudden, I check my emails, head over here, and there's justice left in the world!

Your sites were removed because they're spam. Somebody warned you of this, I remember you making a big fuss that your splogs were in fact not spam. I think it was Adam who told you that, but all of a sudden, Google agrees, and they don't want your sites polluting the quality of their search engine. With your ego, reading that is going to tick you off pretty bad. Just remember when you hit reply, that it's Google you need to convince, to me.

I was gonna yell at F for giving you bona fide help about robots.txt and your blog feed, but you blew the real, helpful, technical advice off. On a subject you were (still are) completely ignorant to, but think might be causing your problem.

But, like I said, this makes me feel just a little better about Bush's contempt for the constitution, and how law and order means as much now in America as it does in Mexico or Latvia. At least the little people like me and you still have to be have, right? So I have to pieces of advice or at least information that will be helpful.

First of all, no one here knows exactly why you got spanked, except you. What rules were you breaking, specifically? You've been spamdexing - posting here for the sole purpose of signature links (and stirring poop) - so that's one thing. If you don't know what the rules are, you better learn them quick, and go down the list until you comply with all of them. Then submit a reinclusion request if you need to.

There's a guy who calls himself Trichnosis, who started a thread about how to "safely" cheat Digg. Or Stumble, or whatever. Another member, Travel Agent, filed a spam report with Google, and T's site vanished from the index. I didn't do this to you, actually, but it sounds like what happened. And to be honest, you deserved it.

At the end of the day, Google doesn't care about your site. They don't care about mine, either, or Adams. Even if Matt Cutts himself gave Adam respeck. Google cares about the quality of their index, because what sites they show to people reflects on them. You're gonna have to put that ego aside, because this isn't about you.

I don't know why I'm bothering to look this stuff up and paste it here for you. But, you're persistent and have a lot of energy, so if you ever decided to stop being a jackass and come over from the dark side, if you could do something about your attention span and work on important projects that take more than five minutes to do, those are where the true payoffs are, and you might actually meet with some success.

http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=35769

Quality guidelines These quality guidelines cover the most common forms of deceptive or manipulative behavior, but Google may respond negatively to other misleading practices not listed here (e.g. tricking users by registering misspellings of well-known websites). It's not safe to assume that just because a specific deceptive technique isn't included on this page, Google approves of it. Webmasters who spend their energies upholding the spirit of the basic principles will provide a much better user experience and subsequently enjoy better ranking than those who spend their time looking for loopholes they can exploit.
If you believe that another site is abusing Google's quality guidelines, please report that site at http://www. google.com/contact/spamreport.html. Google prefers developing scalable and automated solutions to problems, so we attempt to minimize hand-to-hand spam fighting. The spam reports we receive are used to create scalable algorithms that recognize and block future spam attempts.


Quality guidelines - basic principles

• Make pages for users, not for search engines. Don't deceive your users or present different content to search engines than you display to users, which is commonly referred to as "cloaking."
• Avoid tricks intended to improve search engine rankings. A good rule of thumb is whether you'd feel comfortable explaining what you've done to a website that competes with you. Another useful test is to ask, "Does this help my users? Would I do this if search engines didn't exist?"
• Don't participate in link schemes designed to increase your site's ranking or PageRank. In particular, avoid links to web spammers or "bad neighborhoods" on the web, as your own ranking may be affected adversely by those links.
• Don't use unauthorized computer programs to submit pages, check rankings, etc. Such programs consume computing resources and violate our Terms of Service. Google does not recommend the use of products such as WebPosition Gold™ that send automatic or programmatic queries to Google.

Quality guidelines - specific guidelines

• Avoid hidden text or hidden links.
• Don't use cloaking or sneaky redirects.
• Don't send automated queries to Google.
• Don't load pages with irrelevant keywords.
• Don't create multiple pages, subdomains, or domains with substantially duplicate content.
• Don't create pages that install viruses, trojans, or other badware.
• Avoid "doorway" pages created just for search engines, or other "cookie cutter" approaches such as affiliate programs with little or no original content.
• If your site participates in an affiliate program, make sure that your site adds value. Provide unique and relevant content that gives users a reason to visit your site first.

If you determine that your site doesn't meet these guidelines, you can modify your site so that it does and then submit your site for reconsideration.


You may also be interested in...

• How do I add my site to Google's search results?
• How can I create a Google-friendly site?

I'm expecting an angry reply saying no one ever did anything to help you.

My sites, are fine. I figuered out what the problem was actually. =)...They are not spam. Thanks for the advice though... At least your post was constructive.


None of these rules were really broken..This is why I was confused. It is all hand-written content. Two of my sites out of the 6 blogs, are now holding there ranking solid. So I am good, just need to fix the blog templates that was what seemed to be the problem.

Hey guys I'm here....did I miss anything?

Yes, you missed that I fixed my domains..and no just got 400$ worth of SEO software for free...so I no longer need signature links..LOL.

Hey guys I'm here....did I miss anything?

Only the spiraling decay.

Vasity, I dare you to remove your signature then. Also, does this magic software also slice, dice and juliane?

The magic software, which you can look up on the internet.

SEO ELITE 4 (Retail price 167$) my price 0$ yay.

I'll bite. What does this SEO Elite software do for you?

I just Googled them, and I still don't understand. I read a review, and that's using the term pretty **** loosely, and skimmed the software's home page. From all of that, it looks like the program writes you checks for a million dollars.

It's really short on detail about how it'll help you, but a pretty hard sell on how much money you'll get if you use it. That's a bad sign, like test driving a car and the clutch slipping. The "undeniable proof" is very hypothetical, keeps using the words "if you ..."

I'm all for software automating whatever long, boring work a computer can do to free the humans up. But marketing and SEO demand more skill, intelligence, creativity and background knowledge than it's possible to teach a computer with the technology we have today. And for the record, I write software for a living, so I'm not just guessing. You can automate gathering data for a report, but not interpreting it and deciding how to move forward.

Use the software if it saves you time, but Nostradamus predicted that if you expect free software to find you $214,898.06 a month, you're in for disappointment. From the site: "A Staggering $214,898.06 In Profits Reeled In On Autopilot!" Wow.

Where do I send the bill for the time I just saved you?