Tycoon Talk
Become a Big fish!
The number 1 forum for online business!
Post topics, ask questions, share your knowledge.
Tycoon Talk is part of Freelancer.com - find skilled workers online at a fraction of the cost.

The Google Forum


You are currently viewing our The Google Forum as a guest. Please register to participate.
Login



Closed Thread
Google new guideline - going too far?
Old 10-07-2007, 02:51 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
kline11's Avatar
SearchBliss Web Tools

Latest Blog Post:
Oracle Embraces the Cloud
Posts: 1,724
Name: John
Location: USA
Trades: 0
Things are certainly much clearer to me now, Thanks all. I just hope Google can tell the difference.

It was also mentioned about using the nofollow reference tag. I don't, and I see niether does WT. Does anyone here who sells legitimate ads use nofollow?
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
kline11 is online now
View Public Profile
 
 
Register now for full access!
Old 10-07-2007, 03:03 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
ForrestCroce's Avatar
Half Man, Half Amazing

Posts: 3,023
Name: Forrest Croce
Location: Seattle, WA
Trades: 0
Why don't you...?
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
|
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
|
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
ForrestCroce is offline
View Public Profile Visit ForrestCroce's homepage!
 
Old 10-07-2007, 03:16 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
kline11's Avatar
SearchBliss Web Tools

Latest Blog Post:
Oracle Embraces the Cloud
Posts: 1,724
Name: John
Location: USA
Trades: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForrestCroce View Post
Why don't you...?
I just never thought of it...and now that I am, I may. It makes me wonder how many advertise because of or PR without it even being mentioned. It is a webmaster site, and mostly webmasters advertise, so I'm sure they thought of this themselves. Will I lose some of them? Maybe. Is it worth it? Maybe. What should I do?
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
kline11 is online now
View Public Profile
 
Old 10-07-2007, 03:19 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
ADAM Web Design's Avatar
Canadastaninianite

Posts: 5,938
Name: Adam for web page design, not program
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Trades: 0
I will be on a future project (potentially) and I was contemplating using nofollow before the whole paid links thing came out for an unrelated reason: it would keep obedient bots from visiting the advertiser links and therefore give advertisers a more accurate reading of their traffic based on referral stats. The number of referrals would appear to be lower, but would actually be more accurate since the number of bots going through to the advertiser's site would be decreased, and there would be no effect on actual user traffic.

Just another thing to think about, that's all.
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
|
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
(my blog)


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
(with proof)
ADAM Web Design is offline
View Public Profile Visit ADAM Web Design's homepage!
 
Old 10-07-2007, 03:29 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
kline11's Avatar
SearchBliss Web Tools

Latest Blog Post:
Oracle Embraces the Cloud
Posts: 1,724
Name: John
Location: USA
Trades: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADAM Web Design View Post
I will be on a future project (potentially) and I was contemplating using nofollow before the whole paid links thing came out for an unrelated reason: it would keep obedient bots from visiting the advertiser links and therefore give advertisers a more accurate reading of their traffic based on referral stats. The number of referrals would appear to be lower, but would actually be more accurate since the number of bots going through to the advertiser's site would be decreased, and there would be no effect on actual user traffic.

Just another thing to think about, that's all.
Do you think this would lower your advertiser sign-ups or make you lose some? Is nofollow the only way Google can tell how we sell advertising on the "up and up"?
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
kline11 is online now
View Public Profile
 
Old 10-07-2007, 03:31 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
ADAM Web Design's Avatar
Canadastaninianite

Posts: 5,938
Name: Adam for web page design, not program
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Trades: 0
I haven't tried it yet. I personally don't think it would affect my signups, although it may affect my repeats.

Mind you, the project in question is a ways off.
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
|
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
(my blog)


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
(with proof)
ADAM Web Design is offline
View Public Profile Visit ADAM Web Design's homepage!
 
Old 10-07-2007, 03:36 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
ForrestCroce's Avatar
Half Man, Half Amazing

Posts: 3,023
Name: Forrest Croce
Location: Seattle, WA
Trades: 0
If you stop driving bots to your advertisers, they'll see less traffic, and a better conversion rate as a result. Not that it should matter; the number of sales you send them at the end of the day won't change.

I don't run advertising; with my site, it'll do more harm than good. If I did, though, I'd definitely nofollow those links. Some of these are implicitly buying for pr and not for traffic or reach or anything legitimately connected to advertising. These are the sites that Google is going to lump into the 'bad neighborhood' category sooner or later.
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
|
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
|
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
ForrestCroce is offline
View Public Profile Visit ForrestCroce's homepage!
 
Old 10-07-2007, 03:48 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
kline11's Avatar
SearchBliss Web Tools

Latest Blog Post:
Oracle Embraces the Cloud
Posts: 1,724
Name: John
Location: USA
Trades: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForrestCroce View Post
If you stop driving bots to your advertisers, they'll see less traffic, and a better conversion rate as a result. Not that it should matter; the number of sales you send them at the end of the day won't change.

I don't run advertising; with my site, it'll do more harm than good. If I did, though, I'd definitely nofollow those links. Some of these are implicitly buying for pr and not for traffic or reach or anything legitimately connected to advertising. These are the sites that Google is going to lump into the 'bad neighborhood' category sooner or later.
That's what worries me. Thanks.
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
kline11 is online now
View Public Profile
 
Old 10-07-2007, 03:57 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
chrishirst's Avatar
Missing! presumed drunk.

Posts: 41,517
Name: Chris Hirst
Location: Blackpool. UK
Trades: 0
I've literally just finished a piece on Redirecting (Masking) Affiliate Links and there is a bit on there about paid links and how a redirect could help.
The code is in ASP so could be of use to you on SearchBliss John.

Let me know if you see any grammatical or speelnig errurs and anything I've got wrong (Not that it's likely to happen of course )

I'm also coding up a self contained class module for displaying, decoding and redirecting affiliate/paid links onto a page.
__________________
Chris. ->> Links are advertising NOT optimising!! <<-
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- I SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
chrishirst is online now
View Public Profile Visit chrishirst's homepage!
 
Old 10-07-2007, 10:20 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
swiftmed's Avatar
Super Spam Talker

Posts: 905
Trades: 3
yeh i think they are going a little too far on this one. they are trying to control people and what they do
swiftmed is offline
View Public Profile
 
Old 10-08-2007, 07:53 AM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
chrishirst's Avatar
Missing! presumed drunk.

Posts: 41,517
Name: Chris Hirst
Location: Blackpool. UK
Trades: 0
Just come across this blog post
__________________
Chris. ->> Links are advertising NOT optimising!! <<-
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- I SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
chrishirst is online now
View Public Profile Visit chrishirst's homepage!
 
Old 10-08-2007, 09:57 AM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
dansgalaxy's Avatar
Defies a Status

Posts: 6,522
Name: Dan
Location: Swindon
Trades: 0
Hey i read your blog post about that script last night Chrishirst looked good, If there any chance you would do that same in PHP?
__________________
Discounted Web Hosting With XDnet!
>> Get 25% of hosting~ Promo: Webmaster-talk <<

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE

Last edited by dansgalaxy; 10-08-2007 at 04:01 PM..
dansgalaxy is offline
View Public Profile Visit dansgalaxy's homepage!
 
Old 10-08-2007, 10:03 AM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
King Spam Talker

Posts: 1,186
Location: Manchester, UK
Trades: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrishirst View Post
Just come across this blog post
Interesting read. Presumably, Google can lower the toolbar PR of pages on link sellin sites (potentially deterring would be buyers of 'PR9 links') whilst retaining real PR in the background (to keep the usefulness of such a measure).
gringo is offline
View Public Profile Visit gringo's homepage!
 
Old 10-08-2007, 03:04 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
kline11's Avatar
SearchBliss Web Tools

Latest Blog Post:
Oracle Embraces the Cloud
Posts: 1,724
Name: John
Location: USA
Trades: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrishirst View Post
I've literally just finished a piece on Redirecting (Masking) Affiliate Links and there is a bit on there about paid links and how a redirect could help.
The code is in ASP so could be of use to you on SearchBliss John.

Let me know if you see any grammatical or speelnig errurs and anything I've got wrong (Not that it's likely to happen of course )

I'm also coding up a self contained class module for displaying, decoding and redirecting affiliate/paid links onto a page.
Nice script Chris, unfortuanately most of the advertising links are on HTML pages, so I cannot use an asp file include. I have decided to go with the "nofollow" for the moment and I'll see what happens. People who are buying for the traffic should no be offended...I hope. I will certainly bookmark the script for the future...maybe for the forum and seo tool pages that run ASP. Thanks!
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
kline11 is online now
View Public Profile
 
Old 10-08-2007, 06:09 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
Novice Talker

Posts: 9
Name: David G Rumsey
Trades: 0
well well, its a tough one, is this to far? i think its just over the line... im all for cleaning up the web and creating good sites that give you what you want as soon as you go in... but im also in favour of earning some cash, and reciprocal links as there is strength in numbers... and theres nothing wrong with a bit of helping each other out... personally id split the internet in 2... www1 and www2... www1 youd need a license to make websites on, www2 you can post all the pictures of your family hollidays and snaps of your cat as you like
zeroorez is offline
View Public Profile
 
Old 10-08-2007, 06:14 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
chrishirst's Avatar
Missing! presumed drunk.

Posts: 41,517
Name: Chris Hirst
Location: Blackpool. UK
Trades: 0
Quote:
unfortuanately most of the advertising links are on HTML pages
That can be fixed as well with the Application Mappings
__________________
Chris. ->> Links are advertising NOT optimising!! <<-
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- I SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
chrishirst is online now
View Public Profile Visit chrishirst's homepage!
 
Old 10-09-2007, 03:13 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
kline11's Avatar
SearchBliss Web Tools

Latest Blog Post:
Oracle Embraces the Cloud
Posts: 1,724
Name: John
Location: USA
Trades: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrishirst View Post
That can be fixed as well with the Application Mappings
Thanks Chris. I'll have to take a closer look when I get the time.
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
kline11 is online now
View Public Profile
 
Old 10-09-2007, 06:57 PM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
Banned

Posts: 2,898
Location: Canada
Trades: 0
Here is something for you'll to read:
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/how-to-report-paid-links



fastreplies
fastreplies is offline
View Public Profile
 
Old 10-10-2007, 07:18 AM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
chrishirst's Avatar
Missing! presumed drunk.

Posts: 41,517
Name: Chris Hirst
Location: Blackpool. UK
Trades: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by dansgalaxy View Post
Hey i read your blog post about that script last night Chrishirst looked good, If there any chance you would do that same in PHP?
Yep, Not a problem. I am on with it in between other projects, it's not a major task by any stretch, just time constraints.

In fact I could be writing it right this minute instead of this but I've just made a brew instead.
__________________
Chris. ->> Links are advertising NOT optimising!! <<-
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- I SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
chrishirst is online now
View Public Profile Visit chrishirst's homepage!
 
Old 10-10-2007, 11:06 AM Re: Google new guideline - going too far?
dansgalaxy's Avatar
Defies a Status

Posts: 6,522
Name: Dan
Location: Swindon
Trades: 0
Lol.

Wait a sec could you explain what exactly it does and i might be able to write it myself xD
__________________
Discounted Web Hosting With XDnet!
>> Get 25% of hosting~ Promo: Webmaster-talk <<

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
dansgalaxy is offline
View Public Profile Visit dansgalaxy's homepage!
 
Closed Thread     « Reply to Google new guideline - going too far?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML



Page generated in 0.55239 seconds with 11 queries