|
 |
|
|
08-01-2007, 11:49 AM
|
Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 2,111
Name: Matt. (>',')>
Location: London, England.
|
I recently put a video on my googtube blog which featured the comedy stylings of a fellow called "fonejacker". In my haste i called him "phonejacker".
Now, I later found that a lot of people were finding this video post by misspelling fonejacker (my blog appears #1 for the misspelling) and google doesn't display the "did you mean ... ?" link like it usually does for misspellings.
I would like some opinions on two matters.
1. Should i leave the misspelling there?
2. Should i deliberately misspell the name again if i make future posts about the "fonejacker"?
In a way i do like traffic and it is what they are looking for, I'm not being deceptive. But in another way i do like to do things properly.
|
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 11:56 AM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 1,186
Location: Manchester, UK
|
I'd leave it. People are looking for what you have. I wouldn't call it unethical.
Last edited by gringo; 08-01-2007 at 12:04 PM..
|
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 12:05 PM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 5,938
Name: Adam for web page design, not program
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
I'd change it...that way, people don't complain. It doesn't bother me personally, but you ruffle the 1 in 1000 wrong feathers that will complain and you'll never hear the end of it.
|
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 03:38 PM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 5,662
Name: John Alexander
|
I don't see anything even vaguely unethical. One, you're giving people what they ask for, and two, it was an honest mistake that you aren't the only one who made.
Adam's advice is serious, though. What do you think are the chances of someone complaining ( fonehacker might - you spelled his name wrong) and what would Google do if they got a complaint?
I'm not smart enough to help you weigh those, but maybe someone can comment. I know I spell things wrong every now and then, or even just fat finger it. I don't really know how to spell Tierra del Fuego, although I wrote about it pretty recently. I think I spelled it right, but who knows, it might even be open to some regional interpretation. Personally I never made a big deal out of this, I just try not to make so many mistakes people will think I'm the village idiot.
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 12:04 AM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 1,003
Name: Shabbir Bhimani
Location: at Go4Expert.com
|
I don't see anything unethical in this. In fact you should go for misspell each time.
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 12:05 AM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 5,938
Name: Adam for web page design, not program
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shabbirbhimani
I don't see anything unethical in this. In fact you should go for misspell each time.
|
Really? And why is that?
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 12:55 AM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 1,003
Name: Shabbir Bhimani
Location: at Go4Expert.com
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADAM Web Design
Really? And why is that?
|
When the person is looking for something and as Google is not suggesting to him anything he will definitely get some results which are not relevant but with the Mis-spell he will get something more relevant than before. Once Google start suggesting you will definitely see decline in traffic anyways.
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 02:06 AM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 3,023
Name: Forrest Croce
Location: Seattle, WA
|
I misspelled Snoqualmie Falls as Snoqualamie Falls on one of my pages ... when you say it out loud it sounds like it should be spelled the second way. But it's not. The Pacific Northwest spells the names of places to be confusing: Sequim is pronounced "skwim."
Ethics don't have anything to do with it, unless you're charging people for a spell check service. Otherwise, ethics just aren't related to spelling ... or mathematics, or color theory. I really can't spell, and even I've noticed bad spelling all over the net. You don't owe it to the general public or search engines to get that right every time. Think of all the political sites that get the facts wrong, and publish things that are blatantly untrue. That's unethical. Bad spelling, or even bad grammar has nothing to do with ethics, especially when it's not the easiest thing to spell.
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 05:49 AM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 41,517
Name: Chris Hirst
Location: Blackpool. UK
|
__________________
Chris. ->> Links are advertising NOT optimising!! <<-
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Thought for today:- I SEO the only industry where all the cowboys are Indians?
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 09:51 AM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 5,938
Name: Adam for web page design, not program
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shabbirbhimani
When the person is looking for something and as Google is not suggesting to him anything he will definitely get some results which are not relevant but with the Mis-spell he will get something more relevant than before. Once Google start suggesting you will definitely see decline in traffic anyways.
|
So what you're saying is that people should misspell words on purpose because a searcher will get more relevant results and once Google starts suggesting alternate spellings the misspeller will see a decline in traffic.
Does anyone else here think that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever?
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 10:10 AM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 3,621
Name: Thierry
Location: I'm the uber Spaminator !
|
Quote:
|
Does anyone else here think that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever?
|
Yup...
Me too.
__________________
Only a biker knows why a dog sticks his head out the window.
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 11:56 AM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 1,186
Location: Manchester, UK
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADAM Web Design
Does anyone else here think that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever?
|
Not sure what I think about this.
What if stOx has 2 pages, one with the original spelling and one with his sneaky spelling, each having different content. The people searching for each version of the word get what they want.
At the moment if a misspeller searches and no web publisher has misspelled their content, the misspelling public won't find anything. 
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 08:03 PM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 285
Location: Poole UK
|
Everyone a spell checker and we'll all be fine!
__________________
- Find out about Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE. Cult TV.
- Have you been to Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE in England?
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 10:35 PM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 769
Name: DaveBob Roundpants III
Location: Heredia, Costa Rica
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForrestCroce
I misspelled Snoqualmie Falls as Snoqualamie Falls on one of my pages
|
Who WOULDN'T mispell Snowkwalamee?
__________________
"So they have the Internet on computers now?" Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 11:20 PM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 10,688
Name: Steven Bradley
Location: Boulder, Colorado
|
Matt I'm not sure there's anything unethical going on with your misspelling. You might at most be offending fonejacker or someone who knows him or is a fan. I'm not seeing anything unethical in that though.
If anything it's just good business. You're capitalizing on something that others aren't. Is using the misspelling any more unethical than registering a keyword rich domain or using keywords in titles, page headings, URLs, etc?
|
|
|
|
08-04-2007, 09:50 AM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 2,111
Name: Matt. (>',')>
Location: London, England.
|
Thanks for your opinions guys. I think what i will do is leave the current post as it is and in the future use the correct spelling. Will be interesting to see where i rank for the correct spelling too.
|
|
|
|
08-05-2007, 06:20 PM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 800
|
Hi guys
I dont think its unethical either, but with the phrase phone jacker, you might not get the right kind of visitors your site might need lol.
Woc
ps fonejacker is an excellent program i think the webmaster talk people would find it amusing, any of you lot want extra ding dings ?
|
|
|
|
08-05-2007, 08:13 PM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 1,186
Location: Manchester, UK
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stOx
Thanks for your opinions guys. I think what i will do is leave the current post as it is and in the future use the correct spelling.
|
I think yours is the correct spelling, anyway, and everyone else has got it wrong. www.phone-not-fone.co.uk.
|
|
|
|
08-07-2007, 12:22 PM
|
Re: Is This Unethical?
|
Posts: 45
Name: Melanie
Location: Ohio, USA
|
I think its end an user feature at it's finest. You may not have intended it, but how many Brits are finding the right content because of it? Call it customer service, definitely not unethical (by design or otherwise). Misspellings are a fact of life, why else would search engines everywhere offer corrections?
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply to Is This Unethical?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|