|
"They should show the estimated que time in each category"
Not going to happen - there is no que as such, just a pool of suggested sites.
I edit a small category - once I cleared the back log, sites now wait no more than 24 hrs for rejection (>50%) or listed. Other categories (especially commercial/shopping) attract so much spam its hard for an editor to volunteer their time to wade through it all... it may take a year to get to a site.
It is the editors responsibility to build the category - sources for that building come from Google (as an eg) search (a lot of sites are added that are never submitted), from the pool submitted sites - the word 'suggested sites' is being used more now, and from following links in sites that are already there.
The other reason is there can be no estimate of time to list is the volunteer nature of the editors - the pool of suggested sites can be reviewed any way the editor likes - they may:
* review by date of submission (resubmits move sites down)
* add the sites that look easy first - especailly those who appear to comply with the title and description guidelines (keywords and promotional description can hurt you, as the editor has to change it - the editor may choose to move on to the next site rather than deal with it now) (especially in my case as I tend to do this at the end of a full days work at my real job - I am sometimes tired and not in the mood to deal with what may be a good site, but a crappy description in the submission)
* ignore the pool of sites and go to Google to look for some good ones to build up the category.
* review them alphabeticaly by title or by URL
CBP
|