Tycoon Talk
Become a Big fish!
The number 1 forum for online business!
Post topics, ask questions, share your knowledge.
Tycoon Talk is part of Freelancer.com - find skilled workers online at a fraction of the cost.

The Other Search Engines


You are currently viewing our The Other Search Engines as a guest. Please register to participate.
Login



Reply
FTC says search engines should disclose paid listings more clearly
Old 07-01-2002, 02:54 PM FTC says search engines should disclose paid listings more clearly
TimSchroeder's Avatar
Admin/Owner

Posts: 6,141
Location: Orlando, FL
Trades: 0
WASHINGTON (AP) - Internet search engines that take money from Web sites in exchange for prominent placement should make that practice clearer to Web users, federal regulators said Friday.

Many search engine Web sites, including AltaVista, LookSmart and AOL Search, give preferred placement to paid advertisers. The Federal Trade Commission said that prime space can confuse Web users who are looking for the best response to their search, rather than ads for sites that paid up front.

The commission's decision came in response to a complaint from consumer advocacy group Commercial Alert, which is backed by activist Ralph Nader.

Gary Ruskin, executive director of Commercial Alert, said his group is ``defending the advertising-editorial line from the aggressive commercialism of corporate advertisers.''

``When the search engines show that ads are ads, we're hoping consumers will flee these search engines,'' Ruskin said.

While the FTC said it doesn't plan to file suit against the search engines, it will send a letter to each calling for ``clearer disclosure of the use of paid inclusion, including more conspicuous descriptions of paid inclusion itself.''

The FTC said it will send the letter to AltaVista, AOL Time Warner, Direct Hit Technologies, iWon, LookSmart, Microsoft and Terra Lycos.

Since Internet advertising dollars started becoming scarce two years ago, sponsored links have become popular among search engines. But they are not always clearly marked.

For example, a search on AltaVista for ``wine'' will result in four links at the top of the results under the heading ``Products and Services.'' In tiny letters, without an underline that is customarily used in Web links, is the word ``info.'' If a user clicks ``info,'' AltaVista said the links were ``reviewed by editors'' for their relevance. Only later in the disclosure does AltaVista admit they are paid advertisements.

All of LookSmart's search results are paid links, ranked by how much the company paid for the listing. But nowhere on the page is there a clear disclosure that the links were purchased.

An AltaVista spokeswoman said they have not yet received the FTC letter, and declined to comment on the disclosure of paid links. Neither LookSmart nor Microsoft immediately returned calls seeking comment.

AOL spokesman Andrew Weinstein said AOL and Netscape, an AOL property, have adopted the term ``Sponsored Link'' to flag paid ads in search results. Weinstein said the company took its lead from Ruskin, who praised the language coined by search engine Google in his FTC complaint.

A recent survey by Consumers Union found 60 percent of Internet users polled had no idea that certain search engines were paid fees to list some sites more prominently than others.

The FTC said search engine companies should clearly distinguish between paid and non-paid results. Regulators said there is no determination the search engines broke the law, and it plans no other action.
__________________
Webmaster-Talk Admin -
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
| My
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
.


Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE

TimSchroeder is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
 
Register now for full access!
Old 07-02-2002, 11:19 AM
conkermaniac's Avatar
The Nutty Moderator

Posts: 1,012
Location: China
Trades: 0
I think this is ridiculous. I do understand that visitors may be unknowingly clicking on paid advertisements and not exactly getting what they need. However, that's the way business works. If the advertisers paid, they deserve top placement in the search engines. If the search engines showed that they were paid ads, far less users would click on them, possibly resulting in the death of those engines. I can assure you: if Google used this practice, they would be making at least twice as much as they are now. It's simply a smarter business strategy.

This is totally fair, and it does not violate rules whatsoever. Users are barely affected (I mean, I wouldn't really mind clicking on an advertisement), so why should it be the FTC's job to regulate this? They might as well go to Hollywood and force the directors to ensure that all the Oreos being eaten and the Ericsson cellphones being used are clearly displayed to be "promotions" for the product.

What is your opinion of this decision?
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
- Affordable feature-packed remotely hosted message boards!
conkermaniac is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Reply     « Reply to FTC says search engines should disclose paid listings more clearly
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML



Page generated in 0.47357 seconds with 12 queries