|
clearly the impression one gets is that it's a ramshackle low-talent sector with hardly any bright lights
that amsham thing is a bit poor, to me - not very global, and the feel feels all wrong to me, but don't mind me, i've only handled half a million internet users and milked em for a quarter million US dollars of retail sales.
i hate to bump anything that could draw competitors closer to the idea of working out how my goldmine operates, but i can't really not speak out here - nothing shown is high quality, least of all arsemoz, sorry i mean dmoz.
and google - google make me sick. they have totally failed to bring the science of search further forwards, even by a ******n inch, in what will soon turn into a decade.
it's shocking. but it's good for me. i have that many years more experience to reinvest into my own technological and business goals. my directory is currently in need of a lot more manual labour by me, to improve the extent and detail of the database, but the overall structure is all properly set out to handle that very well and as soon as i've finished a period of hardcore marketing work i have to do, i'm going to attend to that work - quality is the most important thing - you have to build quality into all aspects of what you create, and that means ignoring gloss - the false quality people are misguided by.
But the sites mentioned in this thread aren't even glossy. They seem to be poor in every way. 99% of anything called "directory" on the web is dull rubbish which almost nobody will ever click into/through
|
