Does anyone know what is the most expensive web hosting?

Which kind of web hosting are you interested in? Shared dedicated or?

Web hosting industry has different web hosting programs. It begins from shared hosting and ends with dedicated hosting. Dedicated hosting is more cost-effective than Shared hosting.

Expensive is a service that doesn't give value for the money.

As for numerically expensive hosts, Rackspace is often considered to be so. Not that they're "the most expensive" or the only host to go for the high end hosting market.

Oddly, I've found the more you pay for hosting, the worse the hosting is.

If you've got money to burn, get a dedicated server, perhaps try http://mediatemple.net/ - I've only ever heard great things about them.

Originally Posted by mikibaga

Does anyone know what is the most expensive web hosting?

Any that is more than your budget!

Spot the fluff post to get someones sig links in view again

Firehost's HIPAA-compliant hosting starts at $845/mo. No joke: http://www.firehost.com/secure-hosting/hipaa

Originally Posted by chrishirst

Any that is more than your budget!

Exactly.

Otherwise, I think cloud hosting is probably the priciest on the market right now. It seems to me you need a lot of cash on hand to handle the payments per month for cloud specifically.

Dedicated servers are expensive but can be manageable while VPS is clearly the cheaper but performance oriented solution.

the most expensive for me or in the world?

I'm sure any hosting provider can create a plan more expensive than any other one - there is essentially no limit to how expensive a hosting plan can get

For the most part, the most expensive in general would be having a managed dedicated server and/or co-locating your server in a DC.

I think you want to pay more and get the best web hosting services in return?

Originally Posted by WebhostGIANT-Rob

I think you want to pay more and get the best web hosting services in return?

That type of methodology is way flawed in this day and age. High prices don't necessarily bring top notch quality service anymore; especially in the hosting sector.

Many people including me pay low prices and still get high top notch service while people paying double to triple what I pay get major downtime and issues.

A server cluster and grid hosting can get spendy.

It 70% depends on your budget or need, I think.

Originally Posted by blue-dreamer

Spot the fluff post to get someones sig links in view again

Are you about that video links there?

I think that the amount of money anyone should pay should always be equal to the kind of service that would be given. It is also important to make sure that no matter how high the cost maybe, all your needs should be met because if not then that is just plain throwing away hard earned cash
___________________
Freedom to design websites your way

Depends upon what you looking for shared or dedicated

if the webhosing is too slow and not open, it will waste your money, even if it is cheap, in fact, the most expensive.