Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE : New and Improved Ad Blending! Advertisepedia Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
I haven't created any of my own wiki sites, however the vast bulk seem to be powered by MediaWiki. That's probably what I would go for if I were ever to create my own wiki based website.
My vote is for mediawiki too. Easy to install, easy to use. I use an install as my organizer for domains, clients, articles I want to keep a copy of, ebook repository, notes... you get the idea.
That's what I was thinking, but I wanted to see what others thought.
I've installed it and set up a site on it before. I really found it to be a pain to use. It's very unintuitive, but as you said, it is the most powerful. Guess I'll jump back in again.
__________________
Atomm
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE : New and Improved Ad Blending! Advertisepedia Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
well obviously mediawiki.
it is most used and it has also proven that it can handle really large loads with wikipedia.
although media wiki lacks a bit userfreindly ness for admin's as they have to handle most of the configuration by using localsettings.php. but still its performance has no match.
i dont have a wiki, and i havn't heard of mediawiki before, all the sites ive been too were powered by tikiwiki, but i will look up mediawiki later today
I grabbed the latest version of MediaWiki 1.7.1. It only supports PHP5. OUCH!
I am trying 1.6.8 now.
__________________
Atomm
Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE : New and Improved Ad Blending! Advertisepedia Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE