Tycoon Talk
Become a Big fish!
The number 1 forum for online business!
Post topics, ask questions, share your knowledge.
Tycoon Talk is part of Freelancer.com - find skilled workers online at a fraction of the cost.

Website Design Forum


You are currently viewing our Website Design Forum as a guest. Please register to participate.
Login



Freelance Jobs

Reply
html to shtml .. will it affect my search engine placement?
Old 11-02-2004, 06:31 PM html to shtml .. will it affect my search engine placement?
jayell's Avatar
Average Talker

Posts: 20
Trades: 0
I'm re-designing a site right now .. switching from frames to server-side includes. If my file names now have the SHTML extension, rather than HTML .. will it negatively affect my search engine rating (for a site that's been up for 10 years)?

Jayell
jayell is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
 
Register now for full access!
Old 11-26-2004, 09:58 PM
Novice Talker

Posts: 13
Location: Virginia
Trades: 0
Add the following to your .htaccess file and you can use your includes without renaming the file extensions:

Options Includes
AddType text/html .html
AddHandler server-parsed .html
__________________

Please login or register to view this content. Registration is FREE
rlrouse is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit rlrouse's homepage!
 
Old 11-26-2004, 10:40 PM
jayell's Avatar
Average Talker

Posts: 20
Trades: 0
Have never used the htaccess file .. but will have a look.

Thanks
Jayell
jayell is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Reply     « Reply to html to shtml .. will it affect my search engine placement?
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML



Page generated in 0.67060 seconds with 12 queries