Posts: 107
Name: Roy Dixon
Location: Iowa, same as Kirk
|
At first glance, the site looks nice. I like the colors. It has an authoritative look to it, like a library or an expensive office.
Looking more closely, however, I see some things that bother me.
The domain name doesn't really do it for me. I mean it's OK, but not catchy. It won't be easy to remember, and it's going to be really tough to show up in the serps for "attorney".. you have some really tough competition there, so a catchy domain name would have been extremely useful.
The page is full of ads. It looks like the site was set up with monetization as the primary purpose, not substance. I think that's kind of backward thinking. Quality content should be the primary concern. I think most people already have a rather negative opinion of the legal profession. The public sees attorneys as "Money Hungry" and this site kind of confirms that impression (IMO). Why not give the viewer a pleasant surprise? Make the site more about helping people. I think it will go a long way toward making your site memorable.
The homepage is keyword stuffed. The word attorney, or derivations of the word, is used 40 times. 32 times on the homepage's text and 8 more times in Google ads. Out of the 32 times the word is used in the text, it is in BOLD 13 times. I do the same thing, for SEO, but to a much lesser degree. It just seems too much, IMO.
The plural for attorney is "attorneys", not "attorney's" You should lose the apostrophe.
The home page looks like a static web page, but you have a place to post comments at the bottom. What exactly are we supposed to comment on? Is it a website or a blog?
I don't want you to think I'm bashing your site, because that's not my intention. I love the look of it, and I think it has much potential. I just wanted to give you my honest opinion, that's all, so take it for what it's worth.
|
oh and of 'area'
